@article{2016,title={DIFFICULTIES TO TURKISH LANGUAGE AT THE ETYMOLOGICAL APPROACH},abstractNode={Languages hide, under their current images, the traces of a thousand years extending into the unknown and left behind. To make visible these traces, we should look to morphological and semantic fluctuations as stretch, shrink, falling syllable, expansion, contraction and change. Starting out from an unknown era, walking from the premise root morpheme and still existing today, free and bound morphemes, questioned the principles of morphology and syntax, can provide information, taking advantage of the diachronic perspective, about both the current function and appearance beside historical stages. Under this heading, etymology and morphological analysis’s contribution has been questioned to understand Turkish’ structure. Morphemes queried with analysis methods providing to make visible and measurable the morphological mark in words have been questioned language which belongs structurally in terms of etymology and structure and aimed intelligibility of Turkish language.To query the Turkish’s today, was respected the possibility of principle that word keep in the structure and texture morphological stages of development with deep morphology method. According to this, between the root morpheme and its derivations, texture and structure union is ongoing. Although known to be based on a root structure of each derivation block in Turkish, roots sounds change in the track of words and flexing of formal been observed to cause problems. By historical linguistics approach, diachronic perspective and deep morphological analysis, this research can make visible morphological stamp special to Turkish and aims to assist in the understanding of Turkish.},author={Mustafa SARICA},year={2016},journal={International Journal of Language Academy}}