Author :
Abstract
“İyi dil öğrenicisi” iletişim kurmaya karşı güçlü bir istek duyar ve gönüllü bir şekilde tahminde bulunur (Rubin, 1975). İletişimsel Yaklaşım interaktif dil oyunları, bilgi boşluğu, sosyal etkileşim gibi etkinlikler ile öğrencinin hedef dilde iletişim kurmasını teşvik etmektedir (Richards & Rodgers, 1986). Tüm bunlar dikkate alındığında kişiselleştirme niteliği taşıyan alıştırmalar, bir öğrencinin daha çok iletişim kurarak ve konuya kendini dahil ederek daha çok iletişim kurmasını sağlamaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, yabancı dil olarak Türkçe ve İngilizce ders kitaplarında yer alan kişiselleştirme niteliği taşıyan alıştırmaların incelenmesi ve karşılaştırılmasıdır. İngilizce ve Türkçe ders kitaplarındaki kişiselleştirme niteliği taşıyan alıştırmaların gösterimlerinin karşılaştırılmasında ortaya çıkan sonuca göre her iki serinin de A2 seviyelerinde kişiselleştirme alıştırmalarının yoğunluğu artmıştır. Her iki seri birbiriyle karşılaştırıldığında da en yoğun şekilde kişiselleştirme niteliği taşıyan alıştırma sayısına sahip olan kitap ise Speak Out Pre-Intermediate olmuştur. Onu sırasıyla Speak Out Elementary, İzmir A2 ve İzmir A1 izlemiştir.
Keywords
Abstract
A good language learner is willing to learn and guess (Rubin, 1975). Communicative Approach with the help of activities like interactive language games, information gap, social interaction leads students to communicate interactively (Richards & Rodgers, 1986). Taking into account all of these, personalization activities make students communicate more by getting learner’s attention into the topic. Therefore, books teaching Turkish and English need to be prepared with this emphasis. The aim of this study is to examine and compare the personalization exercises in Turkish and English language teaching books. In the comparison of the personalization exercises in Turkish and English teaching coursebooks, percentage of personalization exercises increases in both coursebooks’s second levels. When İzmir and Speak Out are compared, Speak Out Pre-Intermediate has the highest rate for personalization exercises. And it is followed by Speak Out Elementary, İzmir A2 and İzmir A1 respectively.
Keywords
- Arslaner, B. (2009). Personalization of foreign language learning in constructivism: A postmodern perspective. Yayınlanmış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
- Banciu, V., & Jireghie, A. (2012). Communicative language teaching. The Public Administration and Social Policies Review, 1(8), 93-98.
- Benson, P. (2006). Autonomy in language learning. Language Teaching Journal, 40(1), 21- 40.
- Bilaloğlu, S. (2000). Personalization on the web: Design and implementation of the client side of the system. Yayınlanmış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, ODTU, Ankara.
- Bray, B., & McClaskey, K. (2013). Personalization vs differentitation vs individualization. Erişim tarihi: 20 Kasım 2013. http://my-ecoach.com/online/resources/5/PDIreport-v2-8.pdf
- Canale, M. & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1-47.
- Case, A. (2008). 15 ways to personalize your young learner classes. Erişim tarihi: 5 Kasım 2014. http://edition.tefl.net/articles/teacher-technique/personalize-your-younglearner-classes.
- Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. Erişim tarihi: 15 Mart 2014. https://archive.org/stream/NoamChomskySyntcaticStructures/Noam%20Chomsk y%20-%20Syntcatic%20structures_djvu.txt
- Claire, A. & Wilson, J.J. (2013). Speak Out Pre-Intermediate Student’s Book, (Fourth impression). Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
- Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, and assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
- Çanlıoğlu, Ş. (2014). A case study on increasing EFL student’s level of classroom participation through the use of communicative activities. Yayınlanmış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Çağ Üniversitesi, Mersin.
- Çubukçu, F., ( 2012). Teaching skills. Ankara: Nobel.
- Demirel, Ö (2003). Öğretmenlik mesleğine giriş. Ankara: Pegem.
- Eales, F. & Oakes, S. (2013). Speak out elementary student’s book, Essex: Pearson
- Ellis, R. (1985). The study of second language acquisition. New York: OUP
- Ergün, M. & Özsüer, S. (2009). Vygotsky’nin yeniden değerlendirilmesi “A reevaluation on Vygotsky”. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1, 270-292.
- Ferrer, F. (2012). Personalization of education: Reflections from an international perspective. Comparative and international education, 18, 109-127.
- Freitas, S. & Yapp, C. (2005). Personalizing learning in the 21st century. Erişim tarihi: 8 Ekim 2013. https://books.google.com.tr/books?hl=en&lr=&id=h46tAwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR 5&dq=personalization+in+education+books&ots=w4Ve6aPkVG&sig=HDiVH796Bgn oMz_R9JJ0zrOxgpY#v=onepage&q=personalization%20in%20education%20books& f=false
- Fuller, F. F. (1970). Personalized education for teachers. An introduction for teacher educators. Erişim tarihi: 21 Aralık 2013 http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED048105.pdf
- Gardner, H. (1995). Reflections on multiple intelligences: Myths and messages. Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 200-209.
- Gallagher, R. P. (2014). Implementations of technology enhanced personalized learning: Exploration of success criteria, concerns, and characteristics. Yayınlanmış Doktora Tezi. Pepperdine University, Graduate School of Education and Psychology, Malibu.
- Gibbs, N. (2013). The impact of personalization-based tailored instructional communications on college student persistence. Yayınlanmış Doktora Tezi, Walden University, College of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Amerika.
- Günay, V. D., Fidan, Ö., Yıldız, F. ve Çetin, B. (2012). İzmir yabancılar için Türkçe A1 ders kitabı. İstanbul: Papatya Yayıncılık.
- Günay, V. D., Fidan, Ö., Yıldız, F.ve Çetin, B. (2012). İzmir Yabancılar için Türkçe A2 Ders Kitabı. İstanbul: Papatya Yayıncılık.
- Hartley, D. (2009). Personalization: The nostalgic revival of child-centered education? Journal of Education Policy, 24, 423-434.
- Hollman, A.W., Bradfield, T., McConnell, S., Albano, A. D. & Rodriguez, M.C. (2011). Task development and item analyses in innovative measures of early literacy. Erişim tarihi: 5 Haziran 2014 http://www.cehd.umn.edu/ceed/publications/presentations/wackerlehollman/NC ME_paper_AWH_Final_4-18-11.pdf
- Hoz, G. V. (1982). Personalized education. Paris: Monier.
- Hymes, D. (1986). Models of the interaction of language and social life. Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. New York: Basil Blackwell.
- Izmestiev, D. (2002). Personalized learning: A new ICT-Enabled education approach. Moscow: Unesco. Erişim tarihi: 3 Haziran 2014. http://iite.unesco.org/pics/publications/en/files/3214716.pdf
- James, W. K. (2007). What is personalization? Phi Delta Kappan, 3, 217-223.
- Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon. (İlk İnternet baskısı: Temmuz 2009). Erişim tarihi: 25 Ocak 2014. http://www.sdkrashen.com/content/books/principles_and_practice.pdf
- Leading elderly and adult development, (2009). Integrated Model of Personalized learning Guidelines Grundtvig Project LeadLab. Erişim tarihi: 3 Haziran 2014. http://www.leadlab.euproject.org/go.cfm?PageId=6001
- Littlewood, W. T. (1985). Integrating the new and the old in a communicative approach. In Das, B. K. (Ed.) Communicative language teaching. Singapore: Singapore University.
- McLoughlin, C. & Lee, M J. W. (2008). The three P’s of pedagogy for the networked society: personalization, participation, and productivity. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 1, 10-27.
- Nunan, D. (1986). Communicative language teaching: The learner’s view. Paper presented at the RELC Regional Seminar, Singapore.
- Richards, J. C. & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. New York: CUP
- Rubin, J. (1975). What the “Good language learner” can teach us. Tesol quarterly, 9, 41- 50.
- Smith, R. (2008). Learner autonomy. ELT journal, 62. Erişim tarihi: 26 Aralık 2013. http://eltj.oxfordjournals.org
- Vardar, B. (1998). Dilbilimin temel kavram ve ilkeleri. İstanbul: Multilingual.
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge: MIT Press. Erişim tarihi: 16 Şubat 2014.http://www.google.com.tr/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ve d=0CCkQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cles.mlc.edu.tw%2F~cerntcu%2F099cur riculum2FEdu_Psy%2FEP_03_New.pdf&ei=q5vxU61Haa1AWA84CgAg&usg=AFQjC NEK6fj2TumUqhOGFPLFCttd0r8WTQ&bvm=bv.73231344,d.bGE&cad=rja
