TÜRKÇE DERSİNDE ÇOKLU ZEKÂ KURAMI’NIN KULLANILMASININ ORTAOKUL 7. VE 8. SINIF ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN BAŞARI DURUMLARINA ETKİSİ

Author :  

Year-Number: 2016-13
Language : null
Konu : Türk Dili Eğitimi
Number of pages: 140-154
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Bu araştırma, dil bilgisi öğretiminde Çoklu Zekâ Kuramı’nın kullanılmasının, öğrencilerin başarı durumlarına etkisini belirlemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Araştırma deneysel bir çalışma olup kontrol ve deneysel desenlidir. Her sınıf seviyesi için bir kontrol, bir de deney grubu oluşturulmuştur. Deney gruplarındaki dersler Çoklu Zekâ Kuramı destekli işlenirken, kontrol gruplarındaki dersler düz anlatım yöntemiyle işlenmiştir. Araştırma kapsamında ortaokul 7. sınıfta, “Zarflar” ve “Haber ve Dilek Kipleri”; 8. sınıfta, “Fiilimsiler” ve “Cümlenin Ögeleri” konuları seçilmiştir.Öğrencilerin baskın olan zekâ alanlarını belirleyebilmek amacıyla onlara “Öğrencilere Yönelik Çoklu Zekâ Alanları Belirleme Formu” uygulanmıştır. Öğrencilerin konular öncesindeki hazırbulunuşluk düzeylerini tespit etmek amacıyla başarı ön testleri, konular bittikten sonraki başarı durumlarını tespit etmek amacıyla başarı son testleri ve öğrenilen konuların kalıcılıklarını tespit etmek için de son testlerden 21 gün sonra kalıcılık testleri uygulanmıştır.Elde edilen veriler, çalışmanın amacına uygun olarak frekans (f), yüzde (%), aritmetik ortalama ( ), standart sapma (ss) ve t -testi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Gruplar arasında anlamlı bir farkın olup olmadığı ?=.05 düzeyinde test edilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda, Çoklu Zekâ Kuramı’nı Türkçe dersleri kapsamında anlatılan dil bilgisi konularında kullanmanın, öğrencilerin başarı durumlarında ve özellikle de öğrenilen bilgilerin kalıcılıkları üzerinde, düz anlatım yönteminin kullanıldığı kontrol grubu öğrencilerine göre son derece yüksek olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Keywords

Abstract

The present study was conducted for the purpose of determining the effect of the use of the Theory of Multiple Intelligences in grammar instruction on students’ academic standing. The study is experimental with a control and experimental group design. A control and an experimental group were formed for each grade level. The former was instructed with the support of the theory of multiple intelligences while the latter was taught with plain narration method. Within the scope of the study, “adverbs”, and “tenses and modals” were selected for 7th graders and “gerunds and infinitives” and “elements of sentence construction” were selected for 8th graders. In order to determine children’s dominant intelligence areas, “Students’ Areas of Multiple Intelligences Determination Form” was used. Achievement pre-tests were applied for the purpose of finding out students’ level of readiness prior to the instruction; achievement post-tests were applied to find out their academic standing after instructing all subjects and finally permanency tests were applied 21 days after post-tests in order to determine the permanency of the subjects learnt.Data obtained were analyzed by using frequency (f), percentage (%), arithmetic mean ( ), standard deviation (ss) and t-test appropriate to the purpose of the study. Whether there is a significant difference between groups was tested at ?=.05 reliability level. As a result of the study, it was concluded that the effect of the use of Multiple Intelligences Theory at the grammar lessons taught within the scope of Turkish courses on students’ academic standing and especially on the permanency of the knowledge acquired is quite high compared to the students in the control group where plain narration method was used.

Keywords


  • Avanoğlu, A. (2006). Level of relationship between achievement at Turkish course and multiple intelligences areas (Kastamonu Case). Unpublished graduate thesis, Abant İzzet Baysal University, Social Sciences Institute, Department of Turkish Education, Bolu.

  • Ayaydın, A. (2004). Multiple intelligences management in art education and a sample practice. Pamukkale University Journal of Faculty of Education, Volume 15, Pages 18-30.

  • Bumen, N. (2004). Theory of multiple intelligences at school. Ankara: Pegem A Publishing.

  • Canoğlu, I. (2004). A practice on the use of multiple intelligences in instruction by using education technologies. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational TechnologyTOJET, 3(4), 1303-6521.

  • Demir, R. (2010). Examining the learning styles and multiple intelligences areas of the 9th grade students. Unpublished Graduate Thesis, Adana.

  • Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Newyork: Basic Books.

  • Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple Intelligence: The Theory in Practice, New York. Published by Basic Boks.

  • Gardner, H. (1999), Multiple intelligences: Interviews and articles, C. J. Vickers (Ed.), M. Tüzel (Translator). Istanbul: Enka Schools BZD Publishing.

  • Guney, N.; Aytan, T.; Gun, M. (2010). The level of overlapping between elementary school 2nd grade Turkish program and multiple intelligences program. The Journal of International Social Research, Volume: 3, Issue: 12.

  • Guneysu, S. (2002). Reflections of the theory of multiple intelligences on education. Children Monthly Parenting Magazine, Ankara: Kok Publishing.

  • Iflazoglu, A. (2003). The effect of the theory of multiple intelligences supported collaborative learning method on academic achievement and attitudes of elementary school 5th graders. Unpublished Doctorate Dissertation, Çukurova University, Social Sciences Institute, Adana.

  • Kaya, O. N. (2002). The effect of the theory of multiple intelligences on elementary school 7th graders’ success on atoms and atomic structure, the permanency of the knowledge they acquired and their attitudes and perceptions. Unpublished Graduate Thesis, Gazi University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Department of Science Education, Ankara.

  • Kosar, E. (2006). Teacher views on applying theory of multiple intelligences at Turkish courses. Uludag University Journal of Faculty of Education, 19(2), 345-358.

  • Koksal, M.S. (2006). Concept instruction and the theory of multiple intelligences, Kastamonu Journal of Education, V.14, No:2.

  • Kurt, M.; Temelli, A. (2011). The effect of the theory of multiple intelligences practiced on the subject of reproduction systems on students’ academic achievement, Ahi Evran University Journal of Education Faculty, Volume 12, Issue 1, Number 73-84.

  • Kusdemir Kayıran, B. (2007). The effect of the theory of multiple intelligences supported collaborative learning method on attitude towards Turkish course and academic achievement regarding reading comprehension. Unpublished Graduate Thesis, Çukurova University, Institute of Social Sciences, Adana.

  • Saban, A. (2004). The theory of multiple intelligences and education. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.

  • Selçuk, Z., Kayılı, H., and Okut, L. (2004). Multiple inteligences practices. Ankara: Nobel Publishing Distribution.

  • TDK (2005). Turkish Dictionary. Ankara: Turkish Language Institution.

  • Turkuzan, R. (2004). The effect of the theory of multiple intelligences on the junior high school students’ understanding of the subject density and the permanency of what they learnt. Unpublished Graduate Thesis, Gazi University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Department of Physics Education, Ankara.

  • Vural, B. (2004). Student centered education and multiple intelligences. İstanbul: Hayat

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics