Author :
Abstract
Keywords
Abstract
In a learning environment where university students study EFL in large classes with relatively few opportunities for communication, and where students’ learning history tends to emphasize memorization and direct recall of knowledge, classroom debates can provide a vehicle for improving students’ listening and speaking skills, developing important aspects of their pragmatic competence and enhancing their critical thinking skills. Though rewarding, the use of classroom debates can be challenging to both teachers and students. Choosing a suitable format for the debate, familiarizing students with this format, guaranteeing students’ interest in and knowledge about the topic of debate, getting all the students involved in the debate and managing classroom during the debate are only some of the concerns for which a teacher needs to plan. This article offers suggestions for handling all the concerns related to the use of classroom debates. Aiming to optimize the use of debates, the article concludes with presenting a number of proposed techniques for their use in the classroom. Through these techniques, teaching functional language and critical thinking are interwoven to develop students’ both pragmatic competence and critical thinking skills simultaneously.
Keywords
- Alasmari, A. & Ahmed, S. S. (2013). Using debate in EFL classes. English Language Teaching, 6, 147-152.
- Cohen, A. D. & Olshtain, E. (1993). The production of speech acts by EFL learners. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 33-56.
- Fareh, S. (2010). Challenges of teaching English in the Arab world: Why can’t EFL programs deliver as expected? Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 3600-3604.
- Freeley, A. J., & Steinberg, D. L. (2009). Argumentation and debate: Critical thinking for reasoned decision making. Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
- Ishihara, N. & Cohen, A. D. (2010). Learners’ pragmatics: Potential causes of divergence. In N. Ishihara & A. D. Cohen (Eds.), Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture meet (pp. 75-96). Harlow: Pearson Education.
- Kennedy, R. (2007). In-class debates: Fertile ground for active learning and the cultivation of critical thinking and oral communication skills. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 19, 183-190.
- Kennedy, R. (2009). The power of in-class debates. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10, 1-12.
- LeBeau, C. (2007). Balancing global issues and critical thinking in the classroom. The Language Teacher, 31, 33-35.
- Lustigova, L. (2011). Speak your mind: Simplified debates as a learning tool at the university level. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 4, 18-30.
- McGuire, J. M. (2007). Why has the critical thinking movement not come to Korea? Asia Pacific Education Review, 8, 224-232.
- Pally, M. (2001). Skills development in ‘sustained’ content-based curricula: Case studies in analytical/critical thinking and academic writing. Language and Education, 15, 279-305.
- Paul, R. & Elder, L. (2009). The miniature guide to critical thinking concepts and tools. Retrieved from: http://www.criticalthinking.org/store/products/critical-thinkingconcepts-amp-tools/156.
- Shaila, M. Y., & Trudell, B. (2010). From passive learners to critical thinkers: Preparing EFL students for university success. English Teaching Forum, 3, 2-9. Veneziano, E. (2010). Conversation in language development and use: An introduction. First Language, 30, 241-249.
