Author :
Abstract
Bu araştırmanın amacı, öğrencilerin ekrandan okumaya yönelik tutumlarını değerlendirmeye yönelik bir ölçek geliştirmek ve bu ölçeğin geçerlilik ile güvenirlik analizlerini gerçekleştirmektir. Araştırmanın örneklemini Sakarya ilinde 5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflarda öğrenim görmekte olan toplam 297 ortaokul öğrencisi oluşturmaktadır. Ölçeğin faktör yapısını belirlemek amacıyla, açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizleri yapılmıştır. Faktör analizi sonucunda toplam varyansın % 58,92’sini açıklayan, 36 madde ve iki alt boyuttan oluşan bir ölçme aracı geliştirilmiştir. Bu alt boyutlar “ekrandan okumanın okumaya yönelik tutuma olumlu etkileri” ve “ekrandan okumanın okumaya yönelik tutuma olumsuz etkileri” adını taşımaktadır. Ölçekte yer alan maddelerin tamamı %27’lik alt ve üst gruplar için ayırt edicidir (p<0,05). EOYTÖ’nün iç tutarlık katsayısı 0,967; birinci boyut için 0,961 ve ikinci boyut için 0,954 olarak tespit edilmiştir. Bu bulgulara göre EOYTÖ’nün okullarda kullanılabilecek geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğu söylenebilir.
Keywords
Abstract
Objective of this research is to develop a scale for assessing attitudes of students towards reading from screen and to realize validity and reliability analysis of this scale. 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th class students from totally 297 secondary school who are having education in Sakarya province constitute the sample of the research. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis have been executed in order to determine the factorial structure of the scale. An assessment instrument which is consisted of 36 articles and two sub-dimension that explain 58,92% of the total variance has been developed in consequence of factor analysis. These sub-dimensions bear the names of “positive influences of reading from screen on the attitude towards reading” and “negative influences of reading from screen on the attitude towards reading”. All articles which are involved in the scale are characteristic for sub and super-groups of 27% (p<0,05). Internal consistency coefficient (0,967) of ASTRFS (Attitude Scale Towards Reading From Screen) has been determined as 0,961 for the first dimension and as 0,954 for the second dimension. According to these findings we can say that ASTRFS is a valid and reliable assessment instrument to be used in schools.
Keywords
- Allen, D. D. (2003). Attitude Toward Digital and Print-Based Reading: A Survey for Elementary Students. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertations. University of South Florida, Department of Chilhood Education & Literacy Studies, Florida.
- Balcı, A. (2013). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntem, Teknik ve İlkeler. (Genişletilmiş 10. baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
- Baştuğ, M. ve Keskin, H. K. (2013). Ergenlik Dönemi Okuma Tutumu Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye Uyarlanması. Turkish Studies-International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 8(4), 295-311.
- Borgman, C. L. (1999). What are Digital Libraries? Competing Visions. Information Processing and Management, 35, 227-243.
- Castek, J., Hartman, D. K., Leu, D. J., Coiro, J., Henry, L. A. & Zawilinski, L. (2007).
- Cavanaugh, T. (2002). EBooks and Accommodations: Is This the Future of Print Accommodations?, TEACHING Exceptional Children, 35(2), 56-61.
- Chauhan, P. & Lal, P. (2012). Impact of Information Technology on Reading Habits of College Students. IJRREST: International Journal of Research Review in Engineering Science and Technology, 1(1), 101-106.
- Clark, J. (2015). The Impact of Screen Reading on Passage Comprehension. Undergraduate Research Symposium. Book 5. http://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/undergradsymposium2015/5?utm_source=diginole.lib.f su.edu%2Fundergradsymposium2015%2F5&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=P DFCoverPages, E. T. 20.05.2015.
- Colwell, J. (2013). Connecting Old and New Literacies in a Transliterate World. Library Media Connection, 14-16.
- Dağtaş, A. (2013a). Ekrandan okumanın okumaya ve Türkçe dersine yönelik tutuma etkisi. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Sakarya.
- Dağtaş, A. (2013b). Öğretmenlerin Basılı Sayfa ve Ekrandan Okuma Tercihleri ile Eğitimde Elektronik Metin Kullanımına Yönelik Görüşleri. Turkish StudiesInternational Periodical for the Language, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 8(2), 1-25.
- Eco, U. & J.-C. Carrière. (2013). Kitaplarda Kurtulabileceğinizi Sanmayın. (4. Baskı). Jean-Philippe de Tonnac (Söyleşiyi yöneten). Sosi Donaoğlu (Çeviren). İstanbul: Can Sanat Yayınları.
- Edwards, A. L. (1994). Techniques of Attitude Scale Construction. (Second Edition), New York: Irvington Publishers, Inc.
- Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley: Reading MA.
- Grace, K. E. (2011). Comparing The Ipad to Paper: Increasing Reading Comprehension in Digital Age. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Graduate College of Bowling Green State University, USA.
- Güneş, F. ve Kırmızı, F. S. (2014). E-Kitap Okumaya Yönelik Tutum Ölçeğinin (EKOT) Geliştirilmesi: Geçerlilik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(2), 196-212. Doi: 10.14686/BUEFAD.201428178.
- Halme, O. (2011). E-Reading Devices as a New Medium for Newspaper Reading. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Aalto University, School of Economics, Department of Marketing, Finland.
- Hane, P. (2004). Proje Gutenberg Progresses. Information Today, 21(5). http://www.infotoday.com/it/may04/hane1.shtml, E. T. 14.06.2015.
- Harris, P. (June 6-7, 2012). Reading Speed Variations on Paper vs. Computer vs. Kindle. Vision Performance Institute 6th Annual Research Conference. Pacific University Campus, Forest Grove, Oregon.
- Hesieh, P-H. & Dwyer, F. (2009). The Instructional Effect of Online Reading Strategies and Learning Styles on Student Academic Achievements. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 36-50.
- Hong, W., Thong, J. Y. L., Wong, W-M. & Tam, K-Y. (2002). Determinants of User Acceptance of Digital Libraries: An Empirical Examination of Individual Differences and System Characteristics. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(3), 97-124.
- International Reading Association. (2009). New Literacies and 21st-Century Technologies: A Position Statement of the International Reading Association, Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
- Jones, T. & Brown, C. (2011). Reading Engagement: A Comparison Between E-Books and Tradational Print Books in an Elementary Classroom. International Journal of Instrucation, 4(2), 5-22.
- Kalantzis, M. & Cope, B. (2008). Language Education and Multiliteracies. In S. May and N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Language and Education. (2nd Edition). Volume 1: Language Policy and Political Issues in Education, (195–211). New York: Sipringer Science+Business Media, LLC.
- Kretzschmar, F., Pleimling, D., Hosemann, J., Füssel, S., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. & Schlesewsky, M. (2013). Subjective Impressions Do not Mirror Online Reading Effort: Concurrent EEG-Eyetracking Evidence from the Reading of Books and Digital Media. Plos One, 8(2), 1-11. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056178
- Lazarus, B. D. & Callahan, T. (2000). Attitudes Toward Reading Expressed by Elementary School Students Diagnosed with Learning Disabilities. Reading Psychology, 21, 271-282.
- Leech, N. L., Barrett, K.C. & Morgan, G.A. (2005). SPSS for Intermediate Statistics: Use and Interpretation. (Second Edition). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Leu, D. J. (2000). Literacy and Technology: Deictic Consequences for Literacy Education in an Information Age. In M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson and R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research, Volume III, (743-770). Mahway, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Leu, D. J. & Kinzer, C. K. (2000). The Convergence of Literacy Instruction with Networked Technologies for Information and Communication. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(1), 108-127.
- Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., Castek, J. & Henry, L. A. (2004). New Literacies: A Dual-Level Theory of the Changing Nature of Literacy, Instruction, and Assessment. Adapted from “Toward a Theory of New Literacies Emerging from the Internet and Other Information and Communication Technologies” by D.J. Leu Jr., C.K. Kinzer, J.L. Coiro, & D.W. Cammack. In R.B. Ruddell and N.J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading. (5th Ed.), (1570–1613). Newark, DE:
- Leu, D. J., McVerry, J. G., O’Byrne, W. I., Kiili, C., Zawilinski, L., Everett-Cacopardo, H., Kennedy, C. & Forzani, E. (2011). The New Literacies of Online Reading Comprehension: Expanding the Literacy and Learning Curriculum. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55(1), 5-14. doi:10.1598/JAAL.55.1.1.
- Liu, Z. (2005). Reading Behaviour in the Digital Environments: Changes Over the Past Ten Years. Journal of Documentation, 61(6), 700-712. DOI:10.1108/00220410510632040
- Loh, S. C., Branch, R., Shewnown, S. & Ali, R. (2003). The Effects of Text Spacing After the Period for On-Screen Reading tasks. Selected Readings of the 33rd Annual Convention of the International Visual Literacy Association. Breckenridge, Colorado.
- Long, S. A. (2003). The Case for E-Books: An Introduction. New Library World, 104(1184/1185), 29-32. DOI 10.1108/03074800310458269
- Mangen, A., Walgermo, B. R. & Brønnick, K. (2013). Reading Linear Texts on Paper versus Computer Screens: Effects on Reading Comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 61-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.12.002.
- McKenna, M.C., Kear, D. J. and Ellswort, R. A. (1995). Children’s Attitudes Toward Reading: A National Survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(4), 934-956.
- Mihandoost, Z. (2011). Quantitative Study on Reading Attitude: A Meta-Analysis of Quantitative Result. Nature and Science, 10(6), 75-82.
- Mihandoost, Z. & Elias, H. (2011). The Effectiveness of the Barton’s Intervention Program on Reading Comprehension and Reading Attitude of Students with Dyslexia. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci, 5(2), 43-52.
- Myers, D. G. (2009). Using New Interactive Media to Enhance the Teaching of Psychlogy (and Other Disciplines) in Developing Countries. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(1), 99-100.
- Parker, C. T. (2004). An Evaluation of Student Reading Attitudes: Does Ability Affect Attitude?. Unpublieshed Master’s Thesis. University of North Carolina, Department Speciality Studies, Wilmington.
- Rose, E. (2011). The Phenomenology of On-Screen Reading: University Students’ Lived Experience of Digitised Text. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(3), 515526. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01043.x
- Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A. and King, J. (2006). Reporting Structural Equation Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results: A Review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323-337.
- Seitz, L. (2010). Student Attitudes Toward Reading: A Case Study. Journal of Inquiry & Action in Education, 3(2), 30-44.
- Shen, L-B. (2006). Computer Technology and College Students’ Reading Habits. Chia-nan Annual Bulletin, 32, 559-572.
- Smith, M. C. (1989). Reading Attitudes of Pre-service Education Majors. Reading Horizon,
- Snowhill, L. (2001). E-Books and Their Future in Academic Libraries: An Overview. D-Lib Magazine, 7(7/8). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july01/snowhill/07snowhill.html, E. T. 13.06.2015.
- Sun, S-Y., Shieh, C-H. & Haung, K-P. (2013). A Research on Comprehension Differences Between Print and Screen Reading. SAJEMS Special Issue, 16, 87-101.
- Sutherland-Smith, W. (2002). Weaving the Literacy Web: Changes in Reading from Page to Screen. Reading Teacher, 7(55), 662-669.
- Tezbaşaran, A. (1996). Likert Tipi Ölçek Geliştirme Kılavuzu. Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları.
- URL1: http://www.gutenberg.org/wiki/Main_Page, E. T. 04.06.2015.
- Voorhees, G. (2011). Congeniality of Reading on Digital Devices: Measurement and Analysis of Reader Experience. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York.
