ONLINE TEACHING PRACTICE EXPERIENCES OF PRE-SERVICE ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHERS

Author :  

Year-Number: 2022-41
Yayımlanma Tarihi: 2022-05-01 23:58:17.0
Language : İngilizce
Konu : Yabancı Dil Eğitimi
Number of pages: 31-42
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

This study adopted phenomenology, one of the qualitative study patterns, to investigate the pre-service English as a foreign language teachers’ opinions about online practicum in terms of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) of online teaching practice. To reach the aim, 24 pre-service English as a foreign language teachers who attended an online practicum for 12 weeks, and each conducted at least 4 online English lessons using the lesson plans they prepared, were involved in the study. All the pre-service teachers who voluntarily accepted to participate in this study were senior students at the department of English language teaching of a foundation university in Gaziantep, Turkey. The researchers collected the data through focus group interviews on the Zoom platform. The participants who formed 3 focus groups with 8 participants were asked about the online practicum's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. The meetings were recorded and transcribed word by word by the researchers. Both researchers reviewed the data for reliability and validity until the results reached saturation (Huberman & Miles, 2002).  Content analysis was used to analyze the data, and several themes and codes emerged from the qualitative data. The results were discussed in detail with the implications and suggestions for teacher education programs.

Keywords


  • Allen, M., J., & Wright, S. E. (2014). Integrating theory and practice in the pre-service teacher education practicum. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 20(2), 136-151.

  • Azeem, M. (2011). Problems of prospective teachers during teaching practice. Academic Research International, 1(2), 308-316.

  • Bozkurt, A. (2020). Coronavirus (Covid-1 9) pandemic process and educational evaluations in the post-pandemic world: New normal and new education paradigm. AUAd, 6(3), 112- 142. https://hdl.handle.net/11421/25005

  • Budak, F., & Korkmaz, Ş. (2020). An overall evaluation for the Covıd-19 pandemic process: the case of Turkey. Journal of Social Research and Management, 1, 6279.https://doi.org/10.35375/sayod.738657

  • Choy, D., Angela, F. L., Wong, C., Goh, K., & Ling Low, E. (2014). Practicum experience: Pre-service teachers’ self-perception of their professional growth. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(5), 472-482.

  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.

  • Cresswell J. W. & Plano Clark V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed method research. 2nd Sage; Thousand Oaks, CA.

  • Er, H. K. (2022). Writing Assessment of EFL Learners in Online Education: In Alanoglu, M. (Ed): Education & Science 2022 (pp. 85-94). Efe Academy.

  • Ersin, P., Atay, D., & Mede, E. (2020). Boosting Preservice Teachers’ Competence and Online Teaching Readiness through E-Practicum during the COVID-19 Outbreak. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 2 (2) 112-124. https://doi.org/10.46451/ijts.2020.09.09

  • Fives, H., Hamman, D., & Olivarez, A. (2007). Does burnout begin with student-teaching? Analyzing efficacy, burnout, and support during the student-teaching semester. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 916–934.

  • Flores, M. A. (2016). Teacher education curriculum. In J. Loughran & M. L. Hamilton (Eds.), International handbook of teacher education (pp. 187–230). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0366-0_5.

  • Flores, M. A., & Gago, M. (2020). Teacher education in times of Covid-19 pandemic in Portugal: National, institutional and pedagogical responses. Journal of Education for Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1799709.

  • Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., and Hyun, H. H. (1993). How to design and evaluate research in education (Vol. 7). McGraw-hill.

  • Gan, Z. (2013). Learning to teach English language in the practicum: What challenges do non-native ESL student teachers face?. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38 (3), 91-108.

  • Hsu, S. (2005). Help-seeking behavior of student teachers. Educational Research, 47(3), 307–318.

  • Huang, S. Y., & Waxman, H. (2009). The association of school environment to student teachers’ satisfaction and teaching commitment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 235–243.

  • Kidd, W., & Murray, J. (2020). “The Covid-19 pandemic and its effects on teacher education in England: how teacher educators moved practicum learning online.” European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 542-558.

  • Korucu, A.T., & Kabak, K. (2020). Hybrid learning practices and effects in Turkey: A meta- analysis study. Journal of Information and Communication Technologies, 2(2), 88112.https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/bited

  • Koşar, G. (2021). Distance Teaching Practicum: Its Impact on Pre-Service EFL Teachers’ Preparedness for Teaching. Special Issue: COVID-19: Education Response to a Pandemic, 9(2), 111-126.

  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teachers’ knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108 (6), 1017–1054.

  • Moyo, N. (2020). Covid-19 and the future of practicum in teacher education in Zimbabwe: Rethinking the ‘new normal’ in quality assurance for teacher certification. Journal of Education for Teaching. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1802702.

  • Murray-Harvey, R., Slee, P. T., Lawson, M. J., Silins, H., Banfield, G., & Russel, A. (2000). Under stress: the concerns and coping strategies of teacher education students. European Journal of Teacher Education, 23(1), 19–35.

  • Myles, J., Cheng, L. & Wang, H. (2006). Teaching in elementary school: Perceptions of foreign trained teacher candidates on their teaching practicum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(2), 233-245.

  • Nasri, M. N., Husnin, H., Mahmud, S. N. D., & Halim, L. (2020). Mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic: A snapshot from Malaysia into the coping strategies for pre-service teachers' education. Journal of Education for Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1802582.

  • Richards, J.and Crookes, G. (1988). The practicum in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 22(1), 9 27.

  • Sarı, T., & Nayır, F. (2020). Pandemi Dönemi Eğitim: Sorunlar ve Fırsatlar. Electronic Turkish Studies, 15(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.44335

  • Shinta, G. B., & Aprilia, N. (2020). EFL Pre-Service Teachers’ Perceptions of OnlineTeaching Practicum during Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching. 4 (2), 58-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um046v4i2p%25p

  • Sıvacı, S. (2020). Using Technology to Enhance Language Learning: In Sönmez, G, Gürkan, S, & Bush, J. (Eds): The Catchy Trends in ELT (pp. 121 -147). Eğiten.

  • Smith, K., & Lev-Ari, L. (2005). The place of the practicum in pre‐service teacher education: the voice of the students. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 33(3), 289-302.

  • Van Manen, M. (2007). Phenomenology of practice. Phenomenology & Practice, 1(1), 11 30.

  • Yıldırım, Ş., Durmaz, B.N., Çiloğlan Konur, F., & Doyran, F. (2021). Hybrid Education During Pandemic: Voices of University Students and Faculty Members. Jass Studies-The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 14(86), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.29228/JASSS.52357

  • Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the Connections between Campus Courses and Field Experiences in College and University-Based Teacher Education. Journal ofTeacher Education. 61(12), 89–99.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics